Skip to content


Either you’re with us or against us. Again.

How quickly they forget. For seven years after September 11th, 2001, liberals damned George Bush for his “with us or against us” dichotomy. George Lucas went so far as to equate that mentality with evil in his final Star Wars chapter – a move that got a huge number of laughs each time I saw it in the theater (5, if you were wondering).

Now here we are at the end of 2009, nearly a year into our new age of hope, post-partisanship, and change we can believe in – but the “with us or against us” dichotomy has found new life, this time in the minds and actions of the same Democrats who epitomized it as that which was wrong with our country for the last two-terms.

Though the sentiment has gained steam throughout the entire healthcare debate, we’ve reached a boiling point as Joe Lieberman threatens to vote against Harry Reid’s healthcare bill. In the Washington Post, Ezra Klein goes so far as to say:

At this point, Lieberman seems primarily motivated by torturing liberals. That is to say, he seems willing to cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in order to settle an old electoral score.

It seems we’ve reached a point where being opposed to healthcare isn’t simply wrong, but is instead, effectively, genocidal. Disregarding the fact that a dozen Democrats in the Senate have expressed concern about Reid’s legislation, what the left is doing – in no uncertain terms – is further polarizing this country by branding both moderates (Lieberman is not a party-line anything) and conservatives as the enemy.

In George Bush’s case, the black-and-white claim was at least logical – either you support terrorism or you don’t.  In the current manifestation, the shades of grey that have been eliminated represent nothing more than the desperation of a party too incompetent to get the job done.

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with , .


Status Report

I’ve been tied up with odds and ends these past few days.  I’ll be back to blogging sometime late next week…

Posted in Mamacoke Site News.

Tagged with .


Wrong equation, Barb

The healthcare debate is drawing out a lot of extreme behavior and language, but most of it can be discarded as alarmist partisanship – Harry Reid claiming opposition to the bill akin to support for slavery, for example. However, if you strip away the politics, there are still serious moral, ethical, and philosophical concerns that demand attention. Unfortunately, some of our leaders seem to lack the capacity to understand this.

Barbara Boxer just made this claim about the abortion debate central to the bill’s current progress:

“Why are women being singled out here? It’s so unfair,” Boxer said on the Senate floor Tuesday. “We don’t tell men that if they want to … buy insurance coverage through their pharmaceutical plan for Viagra that they can’t do it.”

At a very, very basic level, Boxer stupidly misses the underlying functionality of abortion and Viagra – the former prevents life while the latter enables it, and this puts the two on very separate fields. Or, if you want to remove life from the conversation – which I would bet she does – then she is equating the two, which would mean that she sees abortion as a form of sexual enhancement. And that…well, I don’t think any person would be able to make a convincing argument about that. Continued…

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with , , , .


Give Tiger everything he deserves.

Maybe it takes a foreign perspective to properly frame our society’s moral deterioration. As the media exploits but does not condemn yet another very public affair from a trusted icon, Swedish golf pro Jesper Parnevik – the man who introduced Tiger Woods to his wife Elin – has taken off his gloves.

It’s always sad, and especially sad because me and my wife were at fault hooking her up with him and we probably thought he is a better guy than he is…He’s lost all my respect, I mean, all the respect I had for the guy is gone, that’s pretty much all I can say.

Amen, Jesper.

The media’s handling of celebrity affairs is absurd, but I think it derives almost exclusively from a mentality that developed out of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal. Continued…

Posted in Society, Sports.


Sarah Palin: Birther?

On whether Obama’s birth certificate is an issue:

“Would you make the birth certificate an issue if you ran?” she was asked (around 9 minutes into the video above).

“I think the public rightfully is still making it an issue. I don’t have a problem with that. I don’t know if I would have to bother to make it an issue, because I think that members of the electorate still want answers,” she replied.

“Do you think it’s a fair question to be looking at?” Humphries persisted.

“I think it’s a fair question, just like I think past association and past voting records — all of that is fair game,” Palin said. “The McCain-Palin campaign didn’t do a good enough job in that area.”

And that’s the end of that political career!  Really, it was only a matter of time before she said something birther related.  She’d long ago entered to realm of conspiracy and paranoia.

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with .


Oh No! Isolationists!

A new Pew poll is making the rounds that supposedly demonstrates America’s renewed commitment to “isolationism.”  Daniel Larison breaks down the numbers:

No doubt, there was a higher percentage that answered that the U.S. should “mind its own business and let other countries get along the best they can on their own,” but the alternative was to answer that the U.S. “is the most powerful nation in the world, we should go our own way in international matters, not worrying about whether other countries agree with us or not.” Given that choice between something that sounds reasonable and something that sounds idiotic, a great many non-”isolationists” would prefer the former response. Essentially, the survey offered two choices. On the one hand, the respondent can choose arrogant hegemonism and disregard the interests of all other nations, or he can choose something less obviously obnoxious.

Larison also makes the point that the United States hasn’t really been an “isolationist” country in over a century (if ever).

“Isolationism” is really just a term employed to silence debate on our foreign policy.  Democrats have used it just as much as Republicans in recent years.  Instead of perpetuating our continued military presence in over a hundred countries, and the cost in resources and lives that entails, this country would do well to have quite a few more “isolationists” in its body politic.  Perhaps that would have saved us the fiasco of the two wars we’ve been fighting this decade.

Posted in World.

Tagged with .


Navigating the final frontier

black holeHere’s one of the neatest things I’ve read in a long time: Grand designs for interstellar travel.

Academics from NYU and Kansas State have proposed two potential forms of near light-speed travel – an engine that collects and annihilates dark matter to accelerate, and an engine powered by a contained blackhole, respectively. Truly fascinating stuff, but the greatest part?

No one disputes that building a ship powered by black holes or dark matter would be a formidable task. Yet remarkably there seems to be nothing in our present understanding of physics to prevent us from making either of them. What’s more, Crane believes that feasibility studies like his touch on questions in cosmology that other research hasn’t considered.

Read straight through. The end is the best part. It is hard to see past all of the problems we have on this planet, but articles like this remind one of the awesome possibilities that our universe holds.

Posted in World.


Blame the last guy. Again. And again. And again. And again…

I didn’t listen to Obama’s speech last night since I’m not particularly interested in how he is trying to rationalize screwing up the war in Afghanistan even further. Apparently, however, he made this claim:

“Throughout this period, our troop levels in Afghanistan remained a fraction of what they were in Iraq,” Obama said. “Commanders in Afghanistan repeatedly asked for support to deal with the reemergence of the Taliban, but these reinforcements did not arrive.”

In response, Donald Rumsfeld said:

“I am not aware of a single request of that nature between 2001 and 2006…The president’s assertion does a disservice to the truth and, in particular, to the thousands of men and women in uniform who have fought, served and sacrificed in Afghanistan.”

Now I’m not naive enough to believe that Rumsfeld wouldn’t defend the Bush administration as a political measure, but the precision (not a single request between 01-06) of this statement carries a definite degree of honesty. Added to Obama’s cowardly tendency to consistently blame the last administration for all of his problems and his extended indecision on war policy, this just seems like another example of the Commander in Chief failing to live up to the stature of his position.

At what point will Obama take some responsibility? At what point will the public take that option away from him and hold him accountable?

Posted in Policy, Politics.


The Taliban

They are getting stronger:

A year ago, he said, for every one Allied soldier killed, wounded or captured, some six Taliban were. Now the ratio is 1:1. “This means the Taliban gave as good as they got,” he observes. “During all of 2008 the kill ratio never was so close. This should be unacceptably embarrassing news for the Coalition.”

Is American prepared for that kind of casualty ratio?  Think of the costs involved now that Obama has tacked on an additional three years and thirty thousand G.I.’s.

Posted in World.

Tagged with , .


Can We Win?

With the President set to announce a “surge” of American troops into Afghanistan, keep this in mind:

A U.S. withdrawal leading to a Taliban triumph would electrify jihadists from Marrakech to Mindanao and mark a milestone in the long retreat of American power. Pakistan, having cast its lot with us, would be in mortal peril. NATO, humiliated in its first war, would become more of a hollow shell than it already is.

Obama plans to send tens of thousands more U.S. troops to hold off a resurgent Taliban, even as he plans for their eventual withdrawal.

The United States is today led by a commander in chief who does not believe military victory is possible, who is not sure this war should be fought and who has a timetable in his own mind as to when to draw down our troops. And we face a Taliban that, after eight years of pounding, is stronger than ever, and believes God is on its side and its victory is assured.

Who do we think is ultimately going to prevail?

If this were a necessary war – wouldn’t Obama’s decision regarding troop levels have come months ago?

Posted in World.

Tagged with , .


Fake Mavericks

Posted in Down the Ballot.

Tagged with .


“Mr. Fox” lives up to its title

fantastic-mr-foxWes Anderson’s movies all take place in hipster-cartoonish environments that tease at reality while testing the limits of muted surrealism. So it isn’t much of a stretch to imagine his touch applied to Roald Dahl’s Fantastic Mr. Fox.  But like Spike Jonze did with Where the Wild Things Are, Anderson has repositioned the kid-oriented source material to achieve lofty, adult-oriented goals. In this case, the result is a light-hearted yet honest exploration of masculinity that gently poses some major existential questions.

Voiced confidently by George Clooney (to the point where one feels convinced that the animated character is actually being portrayed by the actor), Mr. Fox is faced with a mid-life crisis. Having sacrificed his career as an expert chicken thief, Fox has settled into a safe life of domestication as a husband, father, and newspaper columnist. But he feels inadequate as a provider – and is disappointed with how little he shares in common with his son – so he compensates by moving the family out of their foxhole and into a tree. Continued…

Posted in Movies.


Republicans Dissent

Freshman Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) is calling on President Obama to begin withdrawing American troops from Afghanistan:

Earlier this year, Chaffetz traveled to the region and said that, since then, he’s “become more engrossed in my conviction it is time to bring our troops home.”

“I am opposed to nation building, and I quite frankly don’t see or understand what victory looks like,” he said. “I believe, as most people do, that our military can do everything we want them to do. … But we’re asking them to fight a war that is not very well-defined. And we are asking them to do so with one hand tied behind their back.”

The GOP used to stand against foreign interventionism and nation building.  Hopefully that sentiment will return now that Bush is out of office.

Posted in World.

Tagged with , , .


Generation Twilight

Box Office Prophets goes beyond its usual numbers analysis to offer some deep sociological analysis of the Twilight movie phenomenon and what it means for adolescent relationships:

Edward is simply a terrible, violent, abusive person; Bella is a suggestible, weak, and emotionally battered woman. Their relationship, if removed from its supernatural context, would be a sad tale of a violent coupling, one that could certainly prove fatal to one or more partners; apparently the ghouls-and-mystery sheen that Stephenie Meyer has painted over her books obscures the facts of this relationship from view, but that gloss does not change the violent nature of Edward and Bella’s romance…

A generation of young girls will not have the tools to discern abuse because all of the warning signs have been normalized and approved by their favorite film. This will lead to violence against women. I am normally not one to say that violent behavior can be blamed on the media, but when something has messages as insidious and destructive as those in Twilight – and when those messages are being delivered to a definitely impressionable audience – the creators are very culpable in the violence to follow. Stephenie Meyer and the Twilight filmmakers have taught a lot of terrible lessons, and will continue to do so; hopefully, parents and educators will have the patience and foresight to undo that damage.

Yikes, that’s scary stuff – especially for a series of books/movies that market themselves on abstinence.  I have no idea it it’s true or not – but then again how many times have we heard this kind of stuff before?  Is there any tangible evidence?

Posted in Movies.

Tagged with .


The Case Against Occupation

From Stephen Walt on why there is such resentment and anger towards the United States in the Middle East:

The bottom line is that you don’t need to be a sociologist, political scientist, or a student of colonialism or foreign cultures to understand why military occupation is such a poisonous activity and why it usually fails. If you’re an American, you just need to read a bit about Reconstruction and reflect on how its effects — along with the effects of slavery itself — have persisted across generations. If that’s not enough, visit a society that is currently experiencing occupation, and take the time to go through a checkpoint or two. Then you might understand why the local population doesn’t view the occupying forces as benevolent and isn’t as grateful as occupiers often think they ought to be.

Of course none of that is particularly shocking or new (at least it shouldn’t be to anyone with a cursory knowledge of world history).

Posted in World.

Tagged with .


What’s Up With Matthew Continetti?

The young writer for The Weekly Standard has become Sarah Palin’s biggest cheerleader.  Continetti has written a book defending the former Alaska Governor from her media critics.  Continetti’s articles have even portrayed Palin as an heir to the populist tradition of William Jennings Bryan and Andrew Jackson.

Palin the next great American populist?  Daniel Larison has something to say about that:

Of course, we understand that the purpose of the article is to give favorable press coverage to Palin and to continue The Weekly Standard’s embarrassing cheerleading for her. There is also a clear desire to burnish Palin’s credentials as the “rogue” anti-elitist and to make her part of the most absurdly artificial tradition of “Jackson-Bryan-Reagan.” After all, no Palin love letter would ever be complete without some reference to how she resembles Reagan in some intangible, mystical way that only devotees can understand. I simply don’t know how one draws a line between William Jennings Bryan, an intense evangelical Christian who fiercely opposed concentrated wealth and power, and Ronald Reagan, a mild Unitarian Presbyterian and former FDR Democrat whose practical domestic legacy was the advancement of corporate and large business interests. Of course, Bryan never won a presidential race, so it’s hard to know whether he would or could have translated his rhetoric into policy, but I doubt very much that he would have recognized any of his legacy in Reagan. How much less is Palin in the same tradition?

Continetti seems to be continuing in the proud tradition of The Weekly Standard by shilling for Republican candidates.  David Brooks did it for McCain, Fred Barnes did it for Bush and now Continetti does it for Palin.

Andrew Sullivan chalks Continetti’s partisan hackery to pure ambition.  That’s probably accurate.  Given that anything with the name “Sarah Palin” attached to it will sell like hotcakes, any aspiring political writer could do quite well ($$$ that is) to jump on the gravy train.

That Continetti is willing to become the poster boy for Palinistas isn’t surprising, but it is nevertheless disappointing.  Back in the spring of 2006, Continetti wrote a little book called the “K Street Gang.”  In it, Continetti detailed how Congressional Republicans under the leadership of Tom Delay sold out on conservatism for the glory of power and wealth.  Mind you that he was doing this before the GOP’s collapse, before it was popular to shake one’s head in disgust.  That book didn’t give me the impression that Continetti would one day trans-morph into a public relations director for a pseudo-candidate whose platform never extends beyond recycled talking points.  Continetti genuinely seemed to be someone willing to challenge the conventional wisdom.  Republicans need a lot more writers like that – young men and women who can still see right from wrong without needing to check on party affiliation.  Perhaps Continetti will get back to that once Palin’s political career finally ends.  I certainly hope so.

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with , .


Happy Thanksgiving

George Washington’s Thanksgiving proclamation:

Posted in Society.

Tagged with .


A Good Summary Of The Immigration Issue

From David Frum:

1) The issue is not just illegal immigration. The problems associated with current immigration policy – very large numbers, very low skills – are associated with the legal dimensions of current policy too.

2) It’s time for Republicans to revisit the actual economics of immigration rather than the slogans. It’s often assumed that immigration is economically beneficial. That’s no longer true, anyway it’s not true for the host population. (Obviously immigration is beneficial to the immigrants themselves, or they would not do it.) The gains to the U.S. economy from current policy are vanishingly tiny. The costs to state governments are surprisingly huge: last I checked, immigration costs every California household $1200 a year in higher state and local taxes.

3) Immigration should be conceived not as an “ethnic” issue, but as a human capital issue. Inadequate schools and low-skilled migration are together pointing the U.S. to a future workforce  (as the ETS has warned) of dramatically lower skills and even literacy.

4) Here’s the toughest nut for Republicans to swallow. We’re going to have to discard the old language that the Bush economy was the “greatest story never told” and squarely face up to how bad the economic record of 2001-2007 was for most Americans. We can’t put immigration as one cause of the disappointment while denying that the disappointment existed in the first place.

Agreed on all points.  The problem of course is that serious immigration reform rapidly runs into charges of racism/it’s un-American to support enforcement.  Most reasonably people can get beyond that heated rhetoric, but there are just enough kooks on both sides of the spectrum to stymie meaningful change and leave this matter in the morass of simple partisanship.

We’ve changed.  The immigrants coming to this country have changed.  The world has changed.  No longer can a man with little grasp of English and nothing more than a rudimentary education come over here and make a middle class income.  No longer can our economy support tens of millions of individuals, un-assimilated into the mainstream, dependent on social services and unable to do to more than the most menial of jobs.  The problem is bigger than illegal vs. legal immigration.

Posted in Policy, World.

Tagged with .


War Tax

Several prominent Congressional Democrats are calling for a “war tax” to finance President Obama’s plans to increase the American military presence in Afghanistan:

Their proposal would impose a 1 percent levy on middle-class taxpayers. Those earning more would be taxed at a higher rate, depending on how much is needed for the war. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin has also talked about a war tax, but only for the wealthy.

Proponents of this levy argue that it’s necessary to offset deficit spending.  Some Democrats have expressed concern that Obama’s actions in Afghanistan will drain support and resources for his ambitious domestic agenda.  That scenario is exactly what happened to LBJ as the Vietnam War consumed his “Great Society.”

Of course the central problem with such a tax is whether or not it will even cover our expenses.  Beyond that are the usual complaints about taxation – will the money really be used to pay for Afghanistan or some other domestic social program? Will the tax ever go away?  Don’t added taxes in a recession = bad? These are all end-runs around the simple truth that the only way to pay for the war is to stop fighting the war.

As has been pointed out recently though, the United States’ ability to simply run up debt isn’t going to last much longer.  To the extent that additional taxation can help break us from the habit of living well beyond our means then I guess I’m for it.  Granted, it won’t end our addiction to low interest rates, consumerism and empire, but a start is a start.  It would at least get the GOP’s attention – if there’s one thing they hate more than terrorists it’s taxes.

Posted in Policy.

Tagged with .


Foreign Policy Insantiy

From Sarah Palin and Mike Pence.

Bomb the world for freedom!!

Posted in World.

Tagged with , .


A GOP Domestic Agenda

Ross Douthat blogs that the Republican Party has room for a domestic policy leader:

Indeed, the example of Gingrich — the way that he’s sought after as a wise man by Republicans, and the way that both the right-wing media and the mainstream press tend to give him more credit as a thinker than he deserves — suggests that precisely because the G.O.P. currently has a reputation for being anti-intellectual, there’s a huge upside for a Republican politician in being identified as that rarest of species — a “conservative with domestic policy ideas.”

I suppose that is accurate to a limited extent.  I certainly agree that Newt Gingrich is hardly a beacon of policy knowledge and prescriptions.  If anything, as Douthat notes, the former House Speaker’s popularity as a “wise man” is evidence of a dearth of high profile policy analysts.

Still, while it may help to cultivate an image of wonkishness in some quarters, the reality is that Republican politicians really don’t have that much to gain from proposing detailed policies and agendas.  This has less to do with the GOP base being opposed to any serious intellectual thought and more to do with the simple nature of our politics.

Were Romney, Pawlenty or Palin to come out with a detailed white paper tomorrow explaining in intricate fashion how they would lower healthcare costs and expand insurance coverage two things would happen: 1) they’d get a short-term news bump as “people with answers” and 2) they’d get ripped apart by their potential primary opponents as well as the media/Democrats.  Every error, every misinterpretation that the human mind could conceive of would be had.  They wouldn’t lose support simply for having a plan – they’d lose support after other Republicans and Democrats got through with them.  The same holds true for Congressional Republicans.  Sure, they can put out vague agendas combating the Obama administrations legislative designs, but it is so much easier being against something.

So what then is the upside of policy detail when the risks are so great? Why not occupy the grey zone of talking points that gives you political support without any of the responsibility?  As Douthat points out, a GOP candidate will likely carry the day because of his or her demeanor and “character” – not because that candidate wants to cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits at $250,000.

P.S.  What’s even the point of putting out detailed proposals?  Not only do Presidential candidates not adhere to them once in office (i.e. Obama campaigned against a health insurance mandate and now seems to embrace it), it’s Congress that writes the bill.  I’d be fine with Presidential candidates releasing broad “statements of principle” (i.e. I will cut departments, withdraw troops from country X…) at least that’s an honest reflection of our governing process.

Posted in Policy.

Tagged with .


STOP IT!

This time for Chinese Premier Wen Jiaboa.

bow

Posted in Politics.


Lou Dobbs ‘12

Former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs is apparently considering a career in politics – and that includes a potential White House run.

Let’s see, Dobbs wants to end America’s military empire overseas, secure the nation’s borders, oppose amnesty and he continually calls out the collusion between big government and big business.

I’d vote for him!

Posted in 2012 Presidential Race.

Tagged with .


Are You A Republican? 10 Questions Will Tell

According to MSNBC, a resolution is being circulated among members of the Republican National Committee that would literally set a check list for party funds and support.  Prediated on the Reagan quote that “someone who agreed with you eight out of ten times was your friend,” the resolution requires perspective GOP candidates to endorse at least eight of the ten items on the list in order to obtain RNC backing.

Republicans have long quoted from Reagan as if his statements came down from some heavenly authority.  It isn’t terribly surprising then that the 40th President’s remarks would take on a law making capacity within the RNC.  Given the disaster of the Bush administration, Republicans will continue to need the security blanket offered by the Gipper – at least until they find someone else whose record can be distorted to fit their purity agenda.  Indeed, it’s debatable whether Reagan himself would pass the litmus test set by those pushing this resolution.

There’s also the larger concern that an influential group of Republicans are drawing a line in the sand when it comes to the political future and viability of the GOP.   This resolution, if passed, would mean no more “official” Republicans from the Northeast or West.  That would for all intents and purposes mean the end of the GOP as a modern political force.  I don’t know if the proponents of this resolution (assuming they aren’t total fools) fully grasp that reality.

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with .


We Are All Michael Jackson

Patrick Deneen looks at the same numbers I did and provides an apt analogy to America’s current fiscal crisis:

We have been a national version of Michael Jackson, living in “Neverland” while borrowing against the things of value that we once possessed from an Asian organization willing to “loan” until it owns us. Like him, we’re having trouble sleeping at night, and like him we’d rather narcotize ourselves (if on our hundreds of cable stations) rather than face facts.

Posted in Economics, Government.

Tagged with , .


The Profit Motive

It saves lives:

Posted in Policy.

Tagged with .


Democrats’ Civil War

While NY-23 sucked up much of the media’s attention when it came to intra-party fighting, the real primary battles in 2010 will be among Democrats.   The Obama administration notoriously quelled a primary challenge in New York’s Kritsten Gillibrand, but in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Kentucky and perhaps even Arkansas, Democrats are eating their own.

Posted in Down the Ballot.

Tagged with .


Reality Begins

Time to pay the piper, America.  The bill for our decades of excess is coming due.  Why isn’t this being talked about constantly on the media?  This needs to country wake up and realize just how deep a hole it is in and how there are no painless solutions.

With the national debt now topping $12 trillion, the White House estimates that the government’s tab for servicing the debt will exceed $700 billion a year in 2019, up from $202 billion this year, even if annual budget deficits shrink drastically. Other forecasters say the figure could be much higher.

In concrete terms, an additional $500 billion a year in interest expense would total more than the combined federal budgets this year for education, energy, homeland security and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The potential for rapidly escalating interest payouts is just one of the wrenching challenges facing the United States after decades of living beyond its means.

Posted in Economics, Government.

Tagged with , .


McCain v. Hayworth?

A new Rasmussen poll has Arizona Senator John McCain in a statistical dead heat with former Congressman J.D. Hayworth in a hypothetical GOP primary.  McCain already faces a primary challenge from the founder of the Minute Man group, Chris Simcox.  Simcox, however, is a non-factor in the race and doesn’t seriously threaten the former Republican presidential candidate.

The very real chance that the most recent Republican nominee for President, a man once vilified then embraced by the activist GOP base, is on the verge of losing re-nomination isn’t all that surprising.  McCain’s Republican support in the 2008 election was predicated largely on two factors: 1) his unflinching support for waging the “war on terrorism” and 2) he was the alternative to Obama.  Now that Romney, Pawlenty and Palin are vying for the right to take on the President, McCain’s usefulness to the GOP has faded.  Indeed, why should the newly populist base of Republicans tolerate Mac when they can get the Bush-Republican Hayworth in office.  I think McCain himself realizes that as long as he doesn’t have someone to pivot against (i.e. Obama) then conservative activists are going to look for an alternative.  This perhaps best explains why McCain has flip-flopped on one of his signature “maverick” issues – climate change.

The next question is what will Sarah Palin do?  She’s already demonstrated a willingness to wade into Republican primary fights and there’s little chance she’d be able to avoid a McCain-Hayworth match.  Palin’s book makes clear that she has no qualms going after those who once (supposedly) supported her.  Could she make the ultimate betrayal and turn her back on the man who brought her into national prominence?  Certainly that would be the “mavericky” thing to do (dontcha know!).  Palin’s politics are merely a re-packaging of what Bush offered for the last eight years (cut taxes and let’s get those terrorists!).  That, in many ways, describes McCain’s potential rival J.D. Hayworth.  Hayworth’s salient issue, however, will be McCain’s amnesty friendly immigration policies.  Has Palin taken her own stance on this matter?

Still, loyalty would likely trump all and I’d bet dollars to donuts Palin would never break with McCain in such a public manner.  Could it cost the former Alaskan governor support?  Possibly, it doesn’t quite fit with her image of “going rogue” to stand with the establishment candidate.  Republicans have made clear, however, that “national security” is the great equalizer.  As long as you are sufficiently hawkish on foreign affairs then the GOP will likely tolerate your presence to a large extent (i.e. Lieberman at the GOP convention, Ann Coulter praising Hillary Clinton in ‘08).  As there has been no great shift in Republican foreign policy philosophy since Bush, Palin’s got a “legitimate” reason to back her former boss.

Posted in Down the Ballot.

Tagged with , .


Ninja Assassin slices and dices its way to awesomeness

ninja-assassinLike all normal males, my masculinity is partly defined by a healthy obsession with ninjas. Of course I watched the first TMNT in slow motion to learn how to use the nunchucks I bought at the Army Surplus store. So it was with tremendous excitement and bias that I received the news that James McTeigue would be making a movie about tons of ninjas killing each other.

For full disclosure, I have to admit that I did not like McTeigue’s V for Vendetta. And the quiet production/very late marketing push for Ninja Assassin had me worried in recent weeks. But Warner Brothers has an impending cult classic on their hands because this movie delivers in all the ways it should. Mostly. Continued…

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized.

Tagged with .